Effect of Vacuum Impregnation on the Quality of Beef Cubes Marinated with Various Natural Meat Tenderizing Agents

Authors

  • Mei Yuee Ooi Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Noor Liyana Yusof Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v12iSP1.949

Keywords:

Bromelain, Marination, Meat tenderizers, Papain, Shelf-life

Abstract

This study investigates  vacuum impregnation technology, a non-thermal approach to treat local beef cubes (2 cm × 2 cm × 2 cm) with three distinct marinades: distilled water (CONTROL), 10% (v/v) pineapple juice (PINE), and 10% (v/v) papaya juice (PAPAYA), both containing plant proteases (bromelain and papain). The primary objective was to evaluate vacuum impregnation (VI) and traditional marination (TM) techniques and assess their impact on beef’s physicochemical attributes, shelf-life stability, and its plant protease activity. Shelf-life tests over 5 days revealed that all beef samples’ pH reached its lowest on day 4, subsequently increasing on day 5. Throughout storage, colour parameters (L*, a*, b*, and ∆E) of treated samples consistently decreased. VI-PINE exhibited the lowest water holding capacity (WHC) over 5 days. Texture profile analysis (TPA) indicated that VI samples' hardness significantly reduced in VI-PINE and VI-PAPAYA compared to TM samples, attributed to coupled plant proteases. VI-PINE showed the highest marinade uptake improvement (21.6%); while having the lowest WHC (15.52%), and all samples' pH ranged in 5.15–6.12. The colour parameters of treated samples increased compared to raw untreated samples. Compared to TM, VI-PINE (1115 g) and VI-PAPAYA (1333 g) significantly reduced beef hardness, with VI-marinated beef also exhibiting higher tyrosine release compared to TM techniques. The application of VI on beef cubes with plant protease-containing marinades provides practical insights for the food industry, offering potential avenues to enhance beef quality, improve shelf life, and optimize flavour incorporation.

References

Radziejewska-Kubzdela E, Biega?ska-Marecik R, Kido? M. Applicability of vacuum impregnation to modify physico-chemical, sensory and nutritive characteristics of plant origin products-a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(9):16577-610.

Fad?lo?lu EE, Serdaro?lu M. The effects of pre and post rigor marinade injection on some quality parameters of Longissimus dorsi muscles. In: 63rd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology; 2017. p. 248-9.

Ros-Polski V, Koutchma T, Xue J, Defelice C, Balamurugan S. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure processing parameters and NaCl concentration on the physical properties, texture and quality of white chicken meat. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2015;30:31-42.

Chan SS, Roth B, Jessen F, Jakobsen AN, Lerfall J. Water holding properties of Atlantic salmon. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2022;21(1):477-98.

Omana DA, Plastow G, Betti M. The use of ?-glucan as a partial salt replacer in high pressure processed chicken breast meat. Food Chem. 2011;129(3):768-76.

Singh TA, Sarangi PK, Singh NJ. Tenderisation of meat by bromelain enzyme extracted from pineapple wastes. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(9):3256-64.

Bou R, Guerrero L, López M, Claret A, López-Mas L, Castellari M. Effect of vacuum impregnation and high hydrostatic pressure treatments on shelf life, physicochemical, and sensory properties of seabream fillets. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2023;16(5):1089-100.

Anbesaw MS. Characterization and potential application of bromelain from pineapple (Ananas comosus) waste (peel) in recovery of silver from X-ray films. Int J Biomater. 2021;2021:1752.

Babalola BA, Akinwande AI, Otunba AA, Adebami GE, Babalola O, Nwufo C. Therapeutic benefits of Carica papaya: A review on its pharmacological activities and characterization of papain. Arab J Chem. 2024;17(1):105369.

Sasireka R, Ganapathy S. Vacuum impregnation: emerging technology for osmotic dehydration of fruits and vegetables. Int J Latest Trends Eng Technol. 2016;7:39-47.

Sharefiabadi E, Serdaroglu M. Application of vacuum impregnation in muscle foods. Food Sci Appl Biotechnol. 2023;6(2):200-14.

Demir H, Çelik S, Sezer YÇ. Effect of ultrasonication and vacuum impregnation pretreatments on the quality of beef marinated in onion juice a natural meat tenderizer. Food Sci Technol Int. 2022;28(4):340-52.

Ha M, Bekhit AE, Carne A, Hopkins DL. Characterisation of commercial papain, bromelain, actinidin and zingibain protease preparations and their activities toward meat proteins. Food Chem. 2012;134(1):95-105.

Mohd Azmi SI, Kumar P, Sharma N, Sazili AQ, Lee SJ, Ismail-Fitry MR. Application of plant proteases in meat tenderization: Recent trends and future prospects. Foods. 2023;12(6):1336.

Santos DI, Fraqueza MJ, Pissarra H, Saraiva JA, Vicente AA, Moldão-Martins M. Optimization of the effect of pineapple by-products enhanced in bromelain by hydrostatic pressure on the texture and overall quality of silverside beef cut. Foods. 2020;9(12):1752.

Kim HW, Hwang KE, Song DH, Kim YJ, Lim YB, Choi JH, et al. Effects of soy sauce on physicochemical and textural properties of tumbled chicken breast. Poult Sci. 2014;93(3):680-6.

Del Pulgar JS, Gázquez A, Ruiz-Carrascal J. Physico-chemical, textural and structural characteristics of sous-vide cooked pork cheeks as affected by vacuum, cooking temperature, and cooking time. Meat Sci. 2012;90(3):828-35.

Jaspal MH, Badar IH, Usman Ghani M, Ijaz M, Yar MK, Manzoor A, et al. Effect of packaging type and aging on the meat quality characteristics of water buffalo bulls. Animals (Basel). 2022;12(2):130.

Fencioglu H, Oz E, Turhan S, Proestos C, Oz F. The effects of the marination process with different vinegar varieties on various quality criteria and heterocyclic aromatic amine formation in beef steak. Foods. 2022;11(20):3251.

Ismail N, Rosman R. Effects of papaya leaves crude extract on the physicochemical and sensory characteristics of marinated chicken meat. Sci Res J. 2018;15(2):35-50.

Hussain N, Weng CH, Munawar N. Effects of different concentrations of pineapple core extract and maceration process on free-range chicken meat quality. Ital J Food Sci. 2022;34(1):124-31.

Gök V, Bor Y. Effect of marination with fruit and vegetable juice on some quality characteristics of turkey breast meat. Braz J Poult Sci. 2016;18:481-8.

Sunantha K, Saroat R. Application of bromelain extract for muscle foods tenderization. Food Nutr Sci. 2011;2011:1-9.

Ayk?n-Dinçer E, Dinçer C. Modeling of sage (Salvia fruticosa miller) phenolics diffusion in meat cubes during ultrasound assisted vacuum impregnation. Food Biosci. 2023;53:102755.

Fischer K. Drip loss in pork: influencing factors and relation to further meat quality traits. J Anim Breed Genet. 2007;124:12-8.

Aidani E, Aghamohammadi B, Akbarian M, Morshedi A, Hadidi M, Ghasemkhani N, et al. Effect of chilling, freezing and thawing on meat quality: a review.

Ye Z, Zhang J, Lorenzo JM, Zhang M, Zhang W. Effects of bromelain on the quality of smoked salted duck. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9(8):4473-83.

Moon SS. Effect of proteolytic enzymes and ginger extract on tenderization of M. pectoralis profundus from holstein steer. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2018;38(1):143-9.

Sharefiabadi E, Serdaroglu M. Application of vacuum impregnation in muscle foods. Food Sci Appl Biotechnol. 2023;6(2):200-14.

Downloads

Published

31.07.2024

How to Cite

Ooi, M. Y., & Yusof, N. L. . (2024). Effect of Vacuum Impregnation on the Quality of Beef Cubes Marinated with Various Natural Meat Tenderizing Agents. Journal of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, 12(SP1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v12iSP1.949