Physicochemical and Rheological Properties of Rice Flour and Starch from Malaysian Rice Cultivars

Authors

  • Mas Amalia Binti Mohd Effendi Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Maryam Shahwis Binti Ahmad Redza Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Aliah Zannierah Binti Mohsin Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Radhiah Shukri Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Anis Shobirin Meor Hussin Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Zulkarami Berahim Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security (ITAFoS), Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Rashidah Sukor Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v12iSP1.947

Keywords:

Rice varieties characterization, Physicochemical properties, Rheological properties, Amylose content, Starch gels behavior

Abstract

Starch consists of amylose and amylopectin polysaccharides that vary in different rice varieties. The development of new rice varieties has presented the need for characterization to determine their applications. This study aims to determine rice flours' physicochemical and rheological properties and starches from two Malaysian varieties, UPM Putra 2 (P2) and NMR 152 (NMR). P2 and NMR flours and starches were analysed for proximate amylose content, pasting, and rheological properties with commercial white rice (JM) as control. P2 and NMR starches had lower amylose contents than JM; meanwhile, their flours contained higher fat, total dietary fiber, and ash than JM flour. Based on thermal analysis, P2, and NMR exhibited similar peak viscosity but differed in breakdown and setback temperatures and final viscosity. Starch gels exhibited solid-like behaviour as their G' was greater than G", and tan δ values were smaller than unity. In conclusion, pasting and rheological properties of rice flours and starches varied for different rice varieties even though both P2 (23.1%) and NMR (23.4%) are medium-amylose starches, while JM (26.6%) is high-amylose starch. The characterization of these rice and starch is essential for them to be further processed into various food products. 

References

Ruan S, Wang L, Li Y, Li P, Ren Y, Gao R, Ma H. Staple food and health: a comparative study of physiology and gut microbiota of mice fed with potato and traditional staple foods (corn, wheat and rice). Food Funct. 2021;12(3):1232-40.

Qian H, Zhang H. Rice flour and related products. In: Handbook of Food Powders. 2024 Jan 1. p. 437-52. Woodhead Publishing.

Mitchell CR. Rice starches: production and properties. In: Starch. 2009 Jan 1. p. 569-78. Academic Press.

Puncha-arnon S, Uttapap D. Rice starch vs. rice flour: Differences in their properties when modified by heat-moisture treatment. Carbohydr Polym. 2013 Jan 2;91(1):85-91.

Lum MS. Physicochemical characteristics of different rice varieties found in Sabah, Malaysia. Trans Sci Technol. 2017;4(2):68-75.

Kraithong S, Lee S, Rawdkuen S. Physicochemical and functional properties of Thai organic rice flour. J Cereal Sci. 2018 Jan 1;79:259-66.

Tangsrianugul N, Wongsagonsup R, Suphantharika M. Physicochemical and rheological properties of flour and starch from Thai pigmented rice cultivars. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Sep 15;137:666-75.

Dorairaj D, Govender NT. Rice and paddy industry in Malaysia: governance and policies, research trends, technology adoption and resilience. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023 Jun 14;7:1093605.

Horwitz W, Latimer GW. Official methods of analysis. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1975.

Udomrati S, Tungtrakul P, Lowithun N, Thirathumthavorn D. Rheological properties of pastes and gels of rice flour with varied amylose contents. Sci Eng Health Stud. 2022 Nov 29:22030007.

Friedman M. Rice brans, rice bran oils, and rice hulls: composition, food and industrial uses, and bioactivities in humans, animals, and cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Nov 13;61(45):10626-41.

Pranoto Y, Marsono Y, Marseno DW. Physicochemical properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) flour and starch of two Indonesian rice varieties differing in amylose content. Int Food Res J. 2017;24(1):108.

Falade KO, Christopher AS. Physical, functional, pasting and thermal properties of flours and starches of six Nigerian rice cultivars. Food Hydrocoll. 2015 Feb 1;44:478-90.

Park IM, Ibáñez AM, Zhong F, Shoemaker CF. Gelatinization and pasting properties of waxy and non-waxy rice starches. Starch?Stärke. 2007 Aug;59(8):388-96.

Woo HD, We GJ, Kang TY, Shon KH, Chung HW, Yoon MR, Lee JS, Ko S. Physicochemical and gelatinization properties of starches separated from various rice cultivars. J Food Sci. 2015 Oct;80(10):E2208-16.

Jang EH, Lee SJ, Hong JY, Chung HJ, Lee YT, Kang BS, Lim ST. Correlation between physicochemical properties of japonica and indica rice starches. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 1;66:530-7.

Alcázar-Alay SC, Meireles MA. Physicochemical properties, modifications and applications of starches from different botanical sources. Food Sci Technol. 2015 Apr;35:215-36.

Wang L, Xie B, Shi J, Xue S, Deng Q, Wei Y, Tian B. Physicochemical properties and structure of starches from Chinese rice cultivars. Food Hydrocoll. 2010 Mar 1;24(2-3):208-16.

Downloads

Published

31.07.2024

How to Cite

Effendi, M. A. B. M. ., Redza, M. S. B. A., Mohsin, A. Z. B., Shukri, R. ., Hussin, A. S. M. ., Berahim, Z. ., & Sukor, R. (2024). Physicochemical and Rheological Properties of Rice Flour and Starch from Malaysian Rice Cultivars. Journal of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, 12(SP1), 72–74. https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v12iSP1.947