Climate-Smart Agriculture in Southeast Asia: Performance, Adoption Realities, and a Practical Way Forward

Authors

  • Helmi Wasoh Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Murni Halim Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nor'Aini Abdul Rahman Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Zulfazli M. Sobri Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Sangkaran Pannerchelvan Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Sabri Pak-Dek Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Firdaus Mohamad Hamzah Centre for Defence Foundation Studies, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Kem Sungai Besi, 57000 Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Yanty Noorzianna Abdul Manaf Halal Research Group, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v13i2.1132

Keywords:

Climate-smart agriculture, Adoption constraints, Resilience measurement, Alternate wetting and drying, Rice intensification

Abstract

Southeast Asia is battered by intensifying climate hazards, yet the region continues to feed hundreds of millions through its vast rice bowls. Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) is increasingly regarded as the most viable route to sustain production, slash greenhouse-gas emissions, and strengthen farmer resilience in the face of worsening shocks. This systematic review consolidates the strongest field-based evidence currently available across the region. Methane emissions are reduced by approximately 35 % and global warming potential by 29 % when Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) is correctly applied, while irrigation water use drops substantially and rice yields remain stable or increase modestly. Greenhouse-gas fluxes are suppressed by roughly 20 % through biochar incorporation, and crop productivity is raised between 10 % and 28 %, with the most pronounced benefits observed on the acidic, low-fertility soils that dominate mainland and insular Southeast Asia. In the Lower Mekong Basin, the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) has been shown to deliver average yield gains of 52 % alongside 70 % higher net economic returns. Despite these robust outcomes, widespread uptake is still constrained by multiple barriers. Training is often inadequate, initial investment costs are perceived as prohibitive, and access to land, credit, extension services, and timely information is distributed unequall-particularly disadvantaging women farmers. Large evidence gaps persist for non-rice agroecosystems and for standardised, comparable indicators of resilience. The review therefore concludes with a clearly sequenced research and policy agenda aimed at shifting CSA from scattered demonstration plots to landscape-scale transformation across Southeast Asia’s diverse farming systems.

References

Agrawal A, Perrin N. Climate adaptation, local institutions, and rural livelihoods. In: Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 350-367. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596667.022.

Ahmed N, Garnett ST. Integrated rice-fish farming in Bangladesh: meeting the challenges of food security. Food Secur. 2011; 3(1):81-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-011-0113-8.

Arslan A, McCarthy N, Lipper L, Asfaw S, Cattaneo A. Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2014; 187:72-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.017.

Bosma RH, Nhan DK, Udo HMJ, Kaymak U. Factors affecting farmers’ adoption of integrated rice–fish farming systems in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Rev Aquac. 2012; 4(3):178-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01069.x.

Cabell JF, Oelofse M. An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecol Soc. 2012; 17(1):18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04666-170118.

Carrijo DR, Lundy ME, Linquist BA. Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 2017; 203:173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002.

Cayuela ML, van Zwieten L, Singh BP, Jeffery S, Roig A, Sánchez-Monedero MA. Biochar’s role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2014; 191:5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.009.

Han Y, Yang P, Zeng H, Zhang J, Yu S, Meng Q, Wu D, Zhu J. Salt tolerance in rice: Physiological responses and molecular mechanisms. Crop J. 2021; 9(1):13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.11.010.

Hooijer A, Page S, Canadell JG, Silvius M, Kwadijk J, Wösten H, Jauhiainen J. Current and future CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences. 2010; 7(5):1505–1514. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1505-2010.

Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011; 144(1):175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015.

Khatri-Chhetri A, Regmi PP, Chanana N, Aggarwal PK. Potential of climate-smart agriculture in reducing women farmers’ drudgery in high climatic risk areas. Clim Change. 2020; 158(1):29-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2350-8.

Klerkx L, Jakku E, Labarthe P. A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS Wageningen J Life Sci. 2019; 90-91:100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315.

Lampayan RM, Rejesus RM, Bouman BAM. Water Management in Rice: A Policy Perspective for Southeast Asia. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute; 2016. Online. Available: https://www.irri.org/publications/water-management-rice-policy-perspective-southeast-asia

Lampayan RM, Rejesus RM, Singleton GR, Bouman BAM. Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for irrigated lowland rice. Field Crops Res. 2015; 170:95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.013.

Lipper L, Thornton P, Campbell BM, Baedeker T, Braimoh A, Bwalya M, et al. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nat Clim Change. 2014; 4(12):1068-1072. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2437.

Maneepitak S, Ullah H, Paothong K, Kachenchart B, Datta A, Shrestha RP. Climate-based suitability assessment for methane mitigation by water saving technology in paddy fields of the Central Plain of Thailand. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020; 4:575823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.575823.

Miettinen J, Hooijer A, Vernimmen R, Liew SC, Page SE. From carbon sink to carbon source: extensive peat oxidation in insular Southeast Asia since 1990. Environ Res Lett. 2017; 12(2):024014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5b6f.

Mishra A, Ketelaar JW, Uphoff N, Whitten M. Food security and climate-smart agriculture in the lower Mekong basin of Southeast Asia: evaluating impacts of system of rice intensification with special reference to rainfed agriculture. Int J Agric Sustain. 2021; 19(2):152-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1866852.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R. Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Aust J Exp Agric. 2006; 46(11):1407-1424. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05037.

Resurreccion BP. Persistent women and environment linkages in climate change and sustainable development agendas. Women’s Stud Int Forum. 2013; 40:33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.03.011.

Sander BO, Samson M, Buresh RJ. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from flooded rice fields as affected by water and straw management between rice crops. Geoderma. 2014; 235-236:355-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.07.020.

Simelton E, Dao TT, Ngo AT, Le TT. Scaling climate-smart agriculture in North-central Vietnam. World J Agric Res. 2017; 5(4):200-211. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjar-5-4-2.

Singh UM, Yadav S, Dixit S, Ramayya PJ, Devi MN, Raman KA, Kumar A. QTL hotspots for early vigor and related traits under dry direct-seeded system in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00286.

Susilawati HL, Setyanto P. Alternate wetting and drying reduces methane emission from a rice paddy in Central Java, Indonesia without yield loss. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2018; 64(1):23-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2017.1409600.

Tirol-Padre A, Minamikawa K, Tokida T, Wassmann R, Yagi K. Site-specific feasibility of alternate wetting and drying as a greenhouse gas mitigation option in irrigated rice fields in Southeast Asia: a synthesis. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2018; 64(1):47-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2017.1409602.

Vo TBT, Wassmann R, Tirol-Padre A, Cao VP, MacDonald B, Espaldon MVO. Methane emission from rice cultivation in different agro-ecological zones of the Mekong river delta: seasonal patterns and emission factors for baseline water management. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2018; 64(1):74-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2017.1413926.

Wandayantolis, Las I, Susilawati HL. Enhancing rice production resilience in South Sumatra, Indonesia: Farmers’ perceptions of climate change, and mitigation and adaptation behavior with special reference to the role of extension. J Smart Agric Environ Technol. 2024; 2(1):62-79. https://doi.org/10.61586/josaet.v2i1.62.

Westermann O, Förch W, Thornton P, Körner J, Cramer L, Campbell B. Scaling up agricultural interventions: case studies of climate-smart agriculture. Agric Syst. 2018; 165:283-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.07.007.

Downloads

Published

12.12.2025

How to Cite

Wasoh, H., Halim, M., Rahman, N. A., Sobri, Z. M. ., Pannerchelvan, S. ., Pak-Dek, M. S., Hamzah, F. M., & Manaf, Y. N. A. . (2025). Climate-Smart Agriculture in Southeast Asia: Performance, Adoption Realities, and a Practical Way Forward. Journal of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, 13(2), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v13i2.1132

Issue

Section

Articles