Effect of Mercury Exposure on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Lowland Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

Authors

  • Leethavani Balachandran Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, D.E, Malaysia.
  • Siti Aqlima Ahmad Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, D.E, Malaysia.
  • Adibah Mohd Amin Department of Land Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Noor Azmi Shaharuddin Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, D.E, Malaysia.
  • Mohamad Zulfazli Mohd Sobri Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Azzreena Mohamad Azzeme Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, D.E, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v12i1.959

Keywords:

Mercury, Lowland tomato, Chlorophyll content, Proline content, Lipid peroxidation

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of mercury (Hg) on tomato plants exposed to varying concentrations (0.01, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.25 ppm) for 14 and 30 days. Hg exposure led to significant reductions in plant height and leaf diameter, with more severe effects at higher concentrations. Notably, 0.01 ppm Hg caused increased branching and earlier ripening, whereas higher concentrations diminished flower and fruit counts, with 0.25 ppm Hg resulting in severe reductions and plant deterioration. Chlorophyll content was slightly higher at 0.01 and 0.05 ppm Hg but decreased at 0.10 and 0.25 ppm, indicating disrupted photosynthesis. Proline content, a stress marker, increased significantly in fruit and roots with higher Hg concentrations, peaking at 0.25 ppm. MDA levels, a marker of lipid peroxidation, increased with Hg concentration and duration, especially at higher levels. Visual symptoms of toxicity, such as wilting and chlorosis, were evident at 0.25 ppm Hg, indicating severe plant stress. The study highlights Hg adverse effects on tomato growth, morphology, and reproductive processes, with high concentrations causing severe toxicity and low concentrations having minor effects. Further research is needed to explore biochemical responses and establish Hg toxicity thresholds in tomato plants.

References

Gworek B, Dmuchowski W, Baczewska-D?browska AH. Mercury in the terrestrial environment: A review. Environ Sci Eur. 2020; 32:128.

Donkor AK, Ghoveisi H, Bonzongo JCJ. Use of metallic mercury in artisanal gold mining by amalgamation: A review of temporal and spatial trends and environmental pollution. Minerals. 2024; 14:555.

Kung HC, Wu CH, Huang BW, Chang-Chien GP, Mutuku JK, Lin WC. Mercury abatement in the environment: Insights from industrial emissions and fates in the environment. Heliyon. 2024; 10:e28253.

Habuer, Yoshimoto N, Takaoka M, Fujimori T, Oshita K, Sakai N et al. Substance flow analysis of mercury in Malaysia. Atmos Pollut Res. 2016; 7:799-807.

Li R, Wu H, Ding J, Fu W, Gan L, Li Y. Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plants. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:1-9.

Uddin S, Khanom S, Islam MR. Mercury contamination in food - An overview. In Kumar N, editor. Mercury toxicity: Challenges and solutions. Singapore: Springer; 2023.p. 33-70.

Guo Z, Gao Y, Yuan X, Yuan M, Huang L, Wang S et al. Effects of heavy metals on stomata in plants: A review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(11), 9302.

Mawari G, Kumar N, Sarkar S, Daga MK, Singh MM, Joshi TK et al. Heavy metal accumulation in fruits and vegetables and human health risk assessment: Findings from Maharashtra, India. Environ Health Insights. 2022; 16: 1-10.

Maurya A, Menon VARADA, Sonwane V, Thakur S, Pai G. Study of hydroponic systems and their variations. Int J Agric Sci. 2017; (5), 547-56.

Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1938). The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Berkeley: University of California; 1938.

Azzeme AM, Abdullah SNA, Aziz MA, Wahab PEM. Oil palm leaves and roots differ in physiological response, antioxidant enzyme activities and expression of stress-responsive genes upon exposure to drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant. 2016; 38:1-12.

Jayawardhane J, Goyali JC, Zafari S, Igamberdiev AU. The response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) plants to three abiotic stresses applied with increasing intensity: Hypoxia, salinity, and water deficit. Metabolites. 2022; 12(1):38.

Hafeez A, Rasheed R, Ashraf MA, Qureshi FF, Hussain I, Iqbal M. Effect of heavy metals on growth, physiological and biochemical responses of plants. In Husen A, editor. Plants and their interaction to environmental pollution. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2023. p. 139-159.

Cho UH, Park JO. Mercury-induced oxidative stress in tomato seedlings. Plant Sci. 2000;156(1):1-9.

Cargnelutti D, Tabaldi LA, Spanevello RM, de Oliveira Jucoski G, Battisti V, Redin M et al. Mercury toxicity induces oxidative stress in growing cucumber seedlings. Chemosphere. 2006; 65(6):999-1006.

Chen J, Shiyab S, Han FX, Monts DL, Waggoner CA, Yang Z, Su Y. Bioaccumulation and physiological effects of mercury in Pteris vittata and Nephrolepis exaltata. Ecotoxicology. 2009; 18:110-21.

Shiyab S, Chen J, Han FX, Monts DL, Matta FB, Gu M et al. Mercury?induced oxidative stress in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Environ Toxicol. 2009; 24(5):462-71.

Ahmad P, Ahanger MA, Egamberdieva D, Alam P, Alyemeni MN, Ashraf M. Modification of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes by 24-epibrassinolide in chickpea seedlings under mercury (Hg) toxicity. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018; 37:309-22.

El-Shehawi AM, Rahman MA, Elseehy MM, Kabir AH. Mercury toxicity causes iron and sulfur deficiencies along with oxidative injuries in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Plant Biosyst. 2022; 156(1):284-91.

??kil R, Surgun-Acar Y, Çatav ?S, Zemheri-Navruz F, Erden Y. Mercury toxicity affects oxidative metabolism and induces stress responsive mechanisms in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2022; 28(4):911-20.

Shao R, Zhang J, Shi W, Wang Y, Tang Y, Liu Z et al. Mercury stress tolerance in wheat and maize is achieved by lignin accumulation controlled by nitric oxide. Environ Pollut. 2022; 307:119488.

Yadav V, Arif N, Ková? J, Singh VP, Tripathi DK, Chauhan DK et al. Structural modifications of plant organs and tissues by metals and metalloids in the environment: A review. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021; 159:100-12.

Shekar CC, Sammaiah D, Shasthree T, Reddy KJ. Effect of mercury on tomato growth and yield attributes. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2011; 2:B364.

Israr M, Sahi S, Datta R, Sarkar D. Bioaccumulation and physiological effects of mercury in Sesbania drummondii. Chemosphere. 2006; 65(4):591-8.

Wang Y, Kang Y, Zhong M, Zhang L, Chai X, Jiang X, Yang X. Effects of iron deficiency stress on plant growth and quality in flowering Chinese cabbage and its adaptive response. Agronomy. 2022; 12(4):875.

Marrugo-Negrete J, Durango-Hernández J, Pinedo-Hernández J, Enamorado-Montes G, Díez S. Mercury uptake and effects on growth in Jatropha curcas. J Environ Sci. 2016; 48:120-5.

Ren JH, Sun HJ, Wang SF, Luo J, Ma LQ. Interactive effects of mercury and arsenic on their uptake, speciation and toxicity in rice seedling. Chemosphere. 2014; 117:737-44.

Solymosi K, Bertrand M. Soil metals, chloroplasts, and secure crop production: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2012; 32:245-72.

Johnson A, Singhal N, Hashmatt M. Metal-plant interactions: Toxicity and tolerance. In Khan MS, Zaidi A, Goel R, Musarrat J, editors. Biomanagement of metal-contaminated soils. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. p. 29-63.

Mulenga C, Clarke C, Meincken M. Physiological and growth responses to pollutant-induced biochemical changes in plants: A review. Pollution. 2020; 6: 827-848.

Kapoor D, Rattan A, Gautam V, Bhardwaj R. Mercury-induced changes in growth, metal & ions uptake, photosynthetic pigments, osmoprotectants and antioxidant defence system in Raphanus sativus L. seedlings and role of steroid hormone in stress amelioration. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2016; 5(4):259-65.

Ge Y, Liu X, Nan F, Liu Q, Lv J, Feng J, Xie S. Toxicological effects of mercuric chloride exposure on Scenedesmus quadricauda. Water. 2022 Oct 13;14(20):3228.

Lenti K, Fodor F, Böddi B. Mercury inhibits the activity of the NADPH: protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR). Photosynthetica. 2002; 40:145-51.

Chen J, Yang ZM. Mercury toxicity, molecular response and tolerance in higher plants. Biometals. 2012; 25:847-57.

Baig MA, Ahmad J, Bagheri R, Ali AA, Al-Huqail AA, Ibrahim MM et al. Proteomic and ecophysiological responses of soybean (Glycine max L.) root nodules to Pb and Hg stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018; 18:1-21.

Frani? M, Gali? V. As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg: Physiological implications and toxicity in plants. In Sablok G., editor. Plant Metallomics and Functional Omics: A System-Wide Perspective. 2019. p. 209-251.

Moreno-Jiménez E, Esteban E, Carpena-Ruiz RO, Peñalosa JM. Arsenic-and mercury-induced phytotoxicity in the Mediterranean shrubs Pistacia lentiscus and Tamarix gallica grown in hydroponic culture. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2009; 72(6):1781-9.

Meng Y, Zhang L, Wang L, Zhou C, Shangguan Y, Yang Y. Antioxidative enzymes activity and thiol metabolism in three leafy vegetables under Cd stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019; 173:214-24.

Smolinska B, Leszczynska J. Photosynthetic pigments and peroxidase activity of Lepidium sativum L. during assisted Hg phytoextraction. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017; 24:13384-93.

Zhang T, Lu Q, Su C, Yang Y, Hu D, Xu Q. Mercury induced oxidative stress, DNA damage, and activation of antioxidative system and Hsp70 induction in duckweed (Lemna minor). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017; 143:46-56.

Ghori NH, Ghori T, Hayat MQ, Imadi SR, Gul A, Altay V et al. Heavy metal stress and responses in plants. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2019; 16:1807-28.

Meena M, Divyanshu K, Kumar S, Swapnil P, Zehra A, Shukla V, Yadav M, Upadhyay RS. Regulation of L-proline biosynthesis, signal transduction, transport, accumulation and its vital role in plants during variable environmental conditions. Heliyon. 2019; 5:e02952.

Siddique A, Kandpal G, Kumar P. Proline accumulation and its defensive role under diverse stress condition in plants: An overview. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2018; 12(3):1655-9.

Behtash F, Amini T, Mousavi SB, Seyed Hajizadeh H, Kaya O. Efficiency of zinc in alleviating cadmium toxicity in hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Ferdos). BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):648.

Budzy?ska S, Rudnicki K, Budka A, Niedzielski P, Mleczek M. Dendroremediation of soil contaminated by mining sludge: A three-year study on the potential of Tilia cordata and Quercus robur in remediation of multi-element pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2024; 944:173941.

Pan Y, Shi J, Li J, Zhang R, Xue Y, Liu Y. Regulatory Mechanism through Which Old Soybean Leaves Respond to Mn Toxicity Stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 14;25(10):5341.

Reddy SH, Al-kalbani H, Al-Qalhati S, Al-Kahtani AA, Al Hoqani U, Azmi SN et al. Proline and other physiological changes as an indicator of abiotic stress caused by heavy metal contamination. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2024; 36(8):103313.

Yang X, Chen Y, Liu W, Huang T, Yang Y, Mao Y et al. Combined transcriptomics and metabolomics to analyse the response of Cuminum cyminum L. under Pb stress. Sci Total Environ. 2024; 923:171497.

Ghosh UK, Islam MN, Siddiqui MN, Cao X, Khan MA. Proline, a multifaceted signalling molecule in plant responses to abiotic stress: Understanding the physiological mechanisms. Plant Biol. 2022; 24(2):227-39.

Zulfiqar F, Ashraf M. Proline alleviates abiotic stress induced oxidative stress in plants. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023; 42(8):4629-51.

Wang F, Zeng B, Sun Z, Zhu C. Relationship between proline and Hg2+-induced oxidative stress in a tolerant rice mutant. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009; 56:723-31.

Zhang Y, Luan Q, Jiang J, Li Y. Prediction and utilization of malondialdehyde in exotic pine under drought stress using near-infrared spectroscopy. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:735275.

Sahu GK, Upadhyay S, Sahoo BB. Mercury induced phytotoxicity and oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2012; 18:21-31.

Mei L, Zhu Y, Zhang X, Zhou X, Zhong Z, Li H et al. Mercury-induced phytotoxicity and responses in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. Plants. 2021; 10:1494.

Malar S, Sahi SV, Favas PJ, Venkatachalam P. Mercury heavy-metal-induced physiochemical changes and genotoxic alterations in water hyacinths [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.)]. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015; 22:4597-608.

Mohammadi S, Pourakbar L, Moghaddam SS, Popovi?-Djordjevi? J. The effect of EDTA and citric acid on biochemical processes and changes in phenolic compounds profile of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) under mercury stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021; 208:111607.

Sytar O, Kumari P, Yadav S, Brestic M, Rastogi A. Phytohormone priming: regulator for heavy metal stress in plants. J Plant Growth Regul. 2019; 38:739-52.

Cho UH, Park JO. Mercury-induced oxidative stress in tomato seedlings. Plant Sci. 2000;156(1):1-9.

Shiyab S, Chen J, Han FX, Monts DL, Matta FB, Gu M, Su Y. Phytotoxicity of mercury in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2009; 72(2):619-25.

Zhou ZS, Huang SQ, Guo K, Mehta SK, Zhang PC, Yang ZM. Metabolic adaptations to mercury-induced oxidative stress in roots of Medicago sativa L. J Inorg Biochem. 2007; 101(1):1-9.

Yuan H, Liu Q, Guo Z, Fu J, Sun Y, Gu C, Xing B, Dhankher OP. Sulfur nanoparticles improved plant growth and reduced mercury toxicity via mitigating the oxidative stress in Brassica napus L. J Clean Prod. 2021; 318:128589.

Downloads

Published

31.07.2024

How to Cite

Balachandran, L. ., Ahmad , S. A., Amin, A. M., Shaharuddin, N. A. ., Sobri, M. Z. M., & Azzeme, A. M. . (2024). Effect of Mercury Exposure on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Lowland Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Journal of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, 12(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v12i1.959

Issue

Section

Articles