Correlation Between Patients with Wounds and Isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus at Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v10i2.755Keywords:
Socio-demographics, Wounds, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital NigeriaAbstract
This study was carried out to determine the correlation between patients with wounds and isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in clinics at Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria. The Socio-demographic, medical and drug histories and characteristics of the wounds from each consented patient were taken using a questionnaire along with sixty samples of the patient’s wound swab samples. Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus from the wound swab samples was carried out using standard phenotypic and genotypic procedures. Out of the 60 samples collected, 30 (50.0%) each were from general out-patient and inpatients. The higher percentage 12 (20.0%) and 39 (65.0%) were patients in the age group between 61 and above and male patients respectively. Regarding the patient’s occupations, the higher percentage 20 (33.3%) of the patients were businessmen and women. The patient’s wound location indicated that a higher percentage of 38 (63.3%) wounds were located on the leg. Also, only 13 (21.7%) patients had diabetes and 44 (73.3%) of the wound patients were receiving antimicrobials; the commonest being metronidazole 11 (18.33%), followed by mupirocin/Supirocin 9 (15.6%). A total of eleven isolates each of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were isolated from the sixty wound swab samples of the in-and out-patients. Association between antimicrobial agents use and the organisms showed significant difference (P < 0.05), while the association between sex, diabetes status, duration of the wound and the isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus from the wound of patients showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).
References
Bowler PG, Duerden BI and Armstrong D. Wound Microbiology and Associated approach to wound management. Clin. Microbiol. Revi.; 2001. 14, 244-269.https:/doi.org/10.1128/CMR14.2.244-269 2001
Khan Z, Faisal S, and Hasnain S. "The continuing threat of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-past, present, future," J. Sci. Res.; 2020. 40, (2): pp. 31-34.
Massadeh HA and Jaran AS. Incident of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in post-operative wound infection. Am. J. infect. Dis.; 2009. 5(10): 1-6.
Oguntibeju OO and Nwobu R. Occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in post-operative wound infection. Pak J med sci.; 2014. 20(3): 187-191.
Winn-Washington AA, Janda WKE, Procop GS, and Paul WG. Koneman's color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia. Scientific Research; 2006. Available at: ((https://www.scirp.org/(s(oyulxb452alntiaej1nfow45))/reference/references Papers.aspx? reference ID=1787397. (Accessed on 12/12/2021).
Ochai JO and Kolhatkar A. Medical Laboratory Science and practice, Tata McGrew Hill publishing limited new Delhi, New York; 2008. Pp535, 539, 632-635.
Benjamin AL and Christopher H. Topical Antimicrobial therapy for treating chronic wounds. Clin. infect. Dis.; 2009.49:1541-9. Doi:10.1086/644732.
Black IG. Sterilization and disinfection, microbiology principles and exploration, 6th edition. John Wiley and Son, U.S.A; 2005. Pp. 347,355-362.
Vallis SJ and Nacente BJ. Hand book of Microbiological culture media, 9edition, Scherlau Chemie S. A., export@scharlau.com; 2006. Pp 68.
Cheesbrough M. District Laboratory practice in tropical countries, part 2, low price edition, Cambridge university press; 2001. Pp 63-70, 91-105, 137-142, 178-186, 194-197
Aneja KR. Experiment in Microbiology plant pathology biotechnology, 4th edition, new age international (p) Ltd, new Delhi New York; 2007. www.new age publisher.com Pp390.
Bobai M, Danjuma L, Sani MN. In vitro antibacterial activity of biologically synthesised silver nanoparticles using Terminalia avicennioides extracts against multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Photopharm.; 2022; 11 (2): 64-74. doi: 10.31254/phyto.2022.11203.
Sharmina M, Monowar T, Abdullah S, Abdullah Y. Clinical and Microbiology aspect of wound infection A review update. Bangladesh J. infect. Dis.; 2014.1(2):32-27.
Christopher GE, Jos AB, John TC, Phillip TM. Mucosal wound healing: the role of age and sex. Arch. Surgic.; 2006. 141:1193-1197.
Hellen AT, Hellen W, Mathew H. Sex and sex hormones mediated wound healing. Doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16438-02. In book: sex and gender difference in infection and treatment for infectious diseases; 2013. Pp.31-48.
Guo S and DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J. Dent. Res. 2010. 89(3): 229. Doi: 10. 1177/0022034509359125.
Zawn V. How does diabetes affect wound healing; 2019. Available at https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/article/320739. (Accessed on 20th January, 2022).
Shittu AO and Lin J. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns and Characterization of Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.BMC Infect. Dis.; 2006. 6, 125.http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-125
Wendy M, Dambudzo P, Moss R, Alpheus Z, and Andrew O. Antibiotics susceptibility patterns of bacteria recovered from wounds of diabetic patients in some Northern KwaZulu-Natal hospital, South Africa. J. Biol. Sci.; 2018. ISN 1727-3048; Doi:10.3923/jobs.2018.13.20
Twilley D, Reva D, Meyer D, and Lall N. Mupirocin promotes wound healing by stimulating growth factor production and proliferation of human keranocytes. Front. pharmacol.; 2022. 13:862112. Doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.862112.
Kozar M, Hamilton H, Koscova J. Types of wounds and the prevalence of bacterial contamination of wounds in the clinical practice of small animals. SCIENDO FOLIA VETERWARIA; 2018. 62 (3):39-47; Doi: 10.2478/fv-2018-0036
Prasanna R, Balasubramanian R, Kunal R, Siddarthan V, Amrita K, Priyanka S, Dilip M, Yashbir S, and Sandhya K. Microbial Inoculants with Multifaceted Traits Suppress Rhizoctonia Populations and Promote Plant Growth in Cotton. J. Phytopathol.; 2016.164. 1030-1042
Walthiq AHA and Mohammed SAA. Molecular detection for nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its Relationship whit multiding resistance, Isolated from Hospitals government. Medico-Legal Update; 2020. 20(1): 633-6335.
Fitzgerald N, Ogunjobi AA and Ogunjobi TE. Comparative of antibacterial Activities of ethanol extracts of the Band seeds Garania kola and Carica papaya. Afr. J. Biomed.; 2004. 14:14 152.
Silva WP, Destra MT, Landgraf M, Franco DGM. Biochemical Characteristics of typical and atypical Staphylococcus aureus in mastitis milk and environmental samples. Braz. J. Microbiol.; 2000.31:103-106.
Tong D, Njume C, Afolayan AJ, Clarke AM and Ndip RN. Crude ethanol extracts of Garcinia Kola Seeds Heckel prolong the lag phase of Helicobacter pylori Inhibitory and bactericidal potential, J. med. food; 2015.14 (7-6); 822-827.
Emma ML, and Warren K. Background paper 6.1 antimicrobial resistance, priority medicines for Europe and the World, a public health approach to inovation. WHO collaborating centre in pharmaceutical policy and regulations; 2013. Pp 2-246. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249995018
Prescott LM, Harley JP, and Klein AD. Microbiology; 7th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York; 2008. pp 852-853, 53-54, 446-455, 832-838.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).