Evaluation of Selected Aqueous Plant Extracts for the Management of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54987/jobimb.v13i1.1090Keywords:
Helicoverpa armigera, Botanical insecticides, Aqueous plant extracts, Integrated pest management (IPM), Cost–benefit analysisAbstract
The focus in this study is the investigation of the insecticidal potential of different water-based plant extracts against the pathogen Helicoverpa armigera, of which the specific attention is given to LC50 values, suppression of larval population, improved yield in tomato, and overall economic feasibility. It was observed that considerable variation was found both among and within plant species during the experimental trials. It was also found that the strongest activity was in fact recorded for Azadirachta indica (LC50 = 0.081%), while Calotropis gigantea (LC50 = 3.244%) and Pongamia pinnata (LC50 = 3.835%) also exhibited notable toxicity. Observation of the plant parts found that Pedalium murex roots were particularly potent. On the other hand, Vitex negundo appeared less effective in LC50 assays (4.231%), yet demonstrated high performance under real field conditions. Field experiments provided further confirmation. Treatments with Ipomoea carnea and V. negundo reduced larval counts per ten tomato plants from 2.43 to 0.52 and 0.59, respectively. When these two species were applied in combination, the reduction was even greater, with larval density dropping to 0.23. The resultant observation has highlighted a synergistic interaction between the species. Results on the yield assessments has revealed crop productivity gains of up to 32%, with Pteridium aquilinum and Homalomena arifolia showing the strongest positive impact. Economic analyses has reinforced these findings where favorable cost–benefit ratios were achieved, particularly with C. gigantea and V. negundo. In these plants, returns exceeded 1:1.8. Taken together, the results emphasize the dual agronomic and economic promise of botanical insecticides. The results in this study are similar to a previous observation that recommend their use as part of integrated pest management programs. A further understanding of the mechanistic insights hinted that larval mortality is linked to immune responses triggered in H. armigera by phytochemicals present in the extracts.
References
Rosell G, Quero C, Coll J, Guerrero A. Biorational insecticides in pest management. J Pestic Sci. 2008;33(2):103-21.
Desai SD, Desai BD. Studies on insecticidal properties of some plants. Shashpa. 2000;7(1):85-8.
Dhaliwal GS, Singh B, editors. Pesticides: Ecological Impact in Developing Countries. New Delhi: Commonwealth Publishers; 1999. p. 30-50.
Chari MS, Patel NG. Cotton leaf worm Heliothis, its biology and integrated control measures. Cotton Dev. 1983;13:7-8.
Ranga Rao G, Rabindra RJ, Nandagopal V, Rameswar Rao. Spodoptera litura (Fab.). In: Nandagopal V, Gunathilagaraj K, editors. Tomato Entomology. New Delhi: Satish Serial Publ House; 2008. p. 65-99.
Koul O, Multani JS, Singh G, Wahab S. Bio-efficacy of toosendanin from Melia dubia against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Curr Sci. 2002;83(11):1387-91.
Kodandaram MH, Dhingra S. Variation in the toxicity of organophosphate insecticides to field populations of H. armigera. Indian J Plant Prot. 2007;35(1):53-6.
Ahmad M, Arif MI, Ahmad M. Occurrence of insecticide resistance in field populations of Spodoptera litura in Pakistan. Crop Prot. 2007;26(6):809-17.
Sahayaraj K. Antifeedant effect of some plant extracts on Spodoptera litura (F.). Curr Sci. 1998;74(6):523-6.
Sahayaraj K, Paulraj MG. Screening the relative toxicity of some plant extracts to Spodoptera litura Fab. Fresen Environ Bull. 1998;7(9-10):557-60.
Raman GV, Srinivasa Rao M, Venkateswarlu B, Srirmannarayana G. Field evaluation of custard apple extracts in tomato crop against Spodoptera litura (Fab.). Indian J Plant Prot. 2007;35(1):64-7.
Sahayaraj K. Field bioefficacy of a reduviid predator Rhynocoris marginatus and plant products against Aproaerema modicella on tomato. Indian J Entomol. 2002;64(3):292-300.
Sahayaraj K, Ravi C. Evaluation of reduviid predators and plant products against chosen tomato pests. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2007;40(4):281-90.
Bajpai NK, Sehgal VK. Efficacy of neem, karanj and tobacco formulations against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in chickpea crop. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl. 2000;7:21-3.
Gujar GT. Biological effects of azadirachtin and plumbagin on Helicoverpa armigera. Indian J Entomol. 1997;59(4):415-22.
Kulat SS, Nandanwar VN, Zade NN, Tirthkar SS. Evaluation of some indigenous plant products for the management of Helicoverpa armigera Hub. on chickpea. J Appl Zool Res. 2001;12(2-3):96-8.
Sahayaraj K, Paulraj MG. Impact of Tridax procumbens leaf extract on Spodoptera litura Fab. behavior and biometry. Insect Environ. 2000;5(4):149-50.
Sundararajan G, Kumuthakalavalli R. Effect of leaf extracts of selected plants against the larvae of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Environ Ecol. 2000;18(1):10-2.
Sundararajan G, Kumuthakalavalli R. Antifeedant activity of aqueous extract of Gnidia glauca and Toddalia asiatica on Helicoverpa armigera. J Environ Biol. 2001;22(1):11-4.
Kalyanasundaram M, Dhandapani N, Swamiappan M, Sundarababu PC, Jeyaraj S. A study on the management of some pests of tomato with biocontrol agents. J Biol Control. 1994;8(1):1-4.
Dhingra S, Phokela A, Mehrotra KN. Cypermethrin resistance in the populations of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Natl Acad Sci Lett. 1998;21(2):123-5.
Patel CC, Koshiya DJ. Insecticidal resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in Gujarat. Indian J Entomol. 1999;61(2):121-6.
Gamble JS. Flora of the Presidency of Madras. 2 vols. London: Allard & Co; 1936. Reprinted 1956.
Matthew KM. An Excursion Flora of Central Tamil Nadu. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publ Co Pvt Ltd; 1991. p. 647-51.
SenthilNathan S, Choi MY, Paik CH, Seo HY, Kim JD, Kang SM. The toxic effect of neem extract and azadirachtin on the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Chemosphere. 2007;67:80-8.
Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265-7.
Finney DJ. Probit Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1971. p. 333.
Sahayaraj K, Selvaraj P, Balasubramanian R. Cell-mediated immune response of Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera litura to fern phytoecdysone. J Entomol. 2007;4(4):289-98.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 V. Mirunaliniraj, G. Sundararajan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
