Detection Limit Determination using the Four-Parameter Logistic Model for the Ultrasensitive Detection of Vibrio cholerae DNA with Polystyrene-coacrylic Acid Composite Nanospheres
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54987/bessm.v5i2.605Keywords:
Detection limit, Four-Parameter Logistic Model, Pooled Standard Deviation, Biosensor, Vibrio choleraeAbstract
Standard laboratory techniques for isolating and identifying V. cholerae can take up to three days and need a well-equipped laboratory with highly experienced personnel. If cholera epidemics go unnoticed for a lengthy period of time, inadequate public health measures, disease spread, and increased death and morbidity are all possible. Cholera cases must be detected and confirmed as soon as feasible using sustainable and precise approaches in order to provide necessary support. Biochemical diagnostic techniques for this pathogen, such as antigen binding, rely on biomolecular interactions as its diagnostic modality, resulting in more complex calibration curves. Additionally, these tests frequently employ sigmoidal curves. When there is asymmetry, a logistic (5PL) or logistic (4PL) curve may be the best representation of a separate sigmoidal relationship. It is possible that linearizing an otherwise nonlinear connection by log transformation disrupts the curve's error structure, having the opposite effect of reducing or even eliminating error in the relationship. The aim of this study is the remodel the data from a calibration curve for the detection of Vibrio cholerae DNA by means of polystyrene-coacrylic acid composite nanospheres using the standard 4-PL model and to determine the Limits of Detection (LOD) based on two methods; the classical definition of limits of detection method and the method based on pooled standard deviation (PSD). The LOD value obtained through the 4PL modelling exercise based on the classical method was 0.255 pM (95% confidence interval of 0.167 to 0.379) while the PSD method yielded an LOD value of 0.035 pM (95% confidence interval of 0.011 to 0.067), which indicates that the PSD method was superior. The classical method was higher than the rough estimation employed originally with an LOD value of 0.125 pM. The use of the 4PL method based on the PSD method was more reliable and robust in estimating the LOD values.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).