Substrate Inhibition Modelling of Pseudomonas nitroreducens Growth on Octylphenol Polyethoxylates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54987/jemat.v11i1.841Keywords:
Substrate Inhibition Models, Teissier, Pseudomonas nitroreducens, Octylphenol polyethoxylates, OPE-degrading bacteriumAbstract
Octylphenol polyethoxylates (OPEs) constitute a class of non-ionic surfactants extensively employed in various industrial applications. However, concerns have arisen regarding the potential environmental and human health impacts of OPEs because of their widespread use and persistence in aquatic environments. Bioremediation of OPE in the environment using OPE-degrading bacterium is appealing as bacterial metabolism converts OPE to harmless carbon dioxide and water as byproducts. In this study, various secondary growth models such as Luong, Yano, Teissier-Edward, Aiba, Haldane, Monod, Han, and Levenspiel were employed to model the inhibitory effect of high OPE concentrations to the growth rate of Pseudomonas nitroreducens TX1 the bacterium on OPE. Following thorough statistical analyses such as root-mean-square error (RMSE), adjusted coefficient of determination (adjR2), bias factor (BF), and accuracy factor (AF), the Teissier model emerged as the most optimal choice. All of the studied models showed good fittings except Moser, Monod and Hinshelwood which showed the poorest curve fitting. The Teissier model emerged as the most suitable model, as indicated by its remarkably low values for RMSE, AICc, and modified adjR2. Furthermore, the model's AF and BF values were close to unity. The experimental data obtained indicates that OPE is toxic and slows down the rate of growth at higher concentrations. The maximum OPE specific growth rate (max), half-saturation concentration (KS), half inhibition concentration (Ki) was 0.613 h-1 (95% Confidence Interval or C.I. from 0.519 to 0.707), 2352.8 mg/L (95% C.I. from 1668.8 to 3036.8) and 52,456.7 mg/L (95% C.I. from 38395.0 to 66518.5), respectively. It is possible that these new constants found when modeling could be useful inputs for future modeling efforts.
References
Osimitz TG, Droege W, Driver JH. Human Risk Assessment for Nonylphenol. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. 2015 Oct 3;21(7):1903-19.
Schüürmann G. Acute aquatic toxicity of alkyl phenol ethoxylates. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1991 Apr 1;21(2):227-33.
Yan B, Luo L, Yang H. Isolation and characterization of Aeromonas sp. TXBc10 capable of high-efficiency degradation of octylphenol polyethoxylate from tannery wastewater. Environ Technol. 2020 Dec 18;41(28):3722-31.
Baldwin WS, Graham SE, Shea D, LeBlanc GA. Altered Metabolic Elimination of Testosterone and Associated Toxicity Following Exposure ofDaphnia magnato Nonylphenol Polyethoxylate. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1998 Feb 1;39(2):104-11.
TenEyck MC, Markee TP. Toxicity of Nonylphenol, Nonylphenol Monoethoxylate, and Nonylphenol Diethoxylate and Mixtures of these Compounds to Pimephales promelas (Fathead Minnow) and Ceriodaphnia dubia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 Nov 1;53(4):599-606.
Song M, Bielefeldt AngelaR. Toxicity and inhibition of bacterial growth by series of alkylphenol polyethoxylate nonionic surfactants. J Hazard Mater. 2012 Jun 15;219-220:127-32.
Rohatgi A. WebPlotDigitizer User Manual 4.3. HttparohatgiinfoWebPlotDigitizerapp Accessed June 2 2014. 2020;1-17.
Yahuza S, Dan-iya BI, Sabo IA. Modelling the Growth of Enterobacter sp . on Polyethylene. J Biochem Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;8(1):42-6.
Sabo IA, Yahuza S, Shukor MY. Molybdenum Blue Production from Serratia sp. strain DRY5: Secondary Modeling. Bioremediation Sci Technol Res. 2021;9(2):21-4.
Monod J. The Growth of Bacterial Cultures. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1949;3(1):371-94.
Boon B, Laudelout H. Kinetics of nitrite oxidation by Nitrobacter winogradskyi. Biochem J. 1962;85:440-7.
Teissier G. Growth of bacterial populations and the available substrate concentration. Rev Sci Instrum. 1942;3208:209-14.
Aiba S, Shoda M, Nagatani M. Kinetics of product inhibition in alcohol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1968 Nov 1;10(6):845-64.
Yano T, Koga S. Dynamic behavior of the chemostat subject to substrate inhibition. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1969 Mar 1;11(2):139-53.
Han K, Levenspiel O. Extended Monod kinetics for substrate, product, and cell inhibition. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988;32(4):430-7.
Luong JHT. Generalization of monod kinetics for analysis of growth data with substrate inhibition. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1987;29(2):242-8.
Moser A. Kinetics of batch fermentations. In: Rehm HJ, Reed G, editors. Biotechnology. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim; 1985. p. 243-83.
Webb JLeyden. Enzyme and metabolic inhibitors [Internet]. New York: Academic Press; 1963. 984 p. Available from: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/7320
Hinshelwood CN. The chemical kinetics of the bacterial cell. Clarendon Press, Gloucestershire, UK; 1946.
Wayman M, Tseng MC. Inhibition?threshold substrate concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1976;18(3):383-7.
Akaike H. Making statistical thinking more productive. Ann Inst Stat Math. 2010;62(1):3-9.
Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes Factors. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995 Jun 1;90(430):773-95.
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer Science & Business Media; 2002. 528 p.
Ross T, McMeekin TA. Predictive microbiology. Int J Food Microbiol. 1994;23(3-4):241-64.
Zhou K, George SM, Métris A, Li PL, Baranyi J. Lag phase of Salmonella enterica under osmotic stress conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(5):1758-62.
Zhao J, Gao J, Chen F, Ren F, Dai R, Liu Y, et al. Modeling and predicting the effect of temperature on the growth of Proteus mirabilis in chicken. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;99(1):38-43.
Velugoti PR, Bohra LK, Juneja VK, Huang L, Wesseling AL, Subbiah J, et al. Dynamic model for predicting growth of Salmonella spp. in ground sterile pork. Food Microbiol. 2011;28(4):796-803.
McElroy DM, Jaykus LA, Foegeding PM. Validation and analysis of modeled predictions of growth of Bacillus cereus spores in boiled rice. J Food Prot. 2000;63(2):268-72.
Kowalik J, Lobacz A, Tarczynska AS, Ziajka S. Graphie validation of growth models for Listeria monocytogenes in milk during storage. Milchwissenschaft. 2012;67(1):38-42.
Jung SH, Park SJ, Chun HH, Song KB. Effects of combined treatment of aqueous chlorine dioxide and fumaric acid on the microbial growth in fresh-cut paprika (capsicum annuum L.). J Appl Biol Chem. 2014;57(1):83-7.
Huang L, Hwang CA, Phillips J. Evaluating the Effect of Temperature on Microbial Growth Rate-The Ratkowsky and a B?lehrádek-Type Models. J Food Sci. 2011;76(8):M547-57.
Zhao H, Zhu J, Liu S, Zhou X. Kinetics study of nicosulfuron degradation by a Pseudomonas nitroreducens strain NSA02. Biodegradation. 2018;29(3):271-83.
Najim AA, Ismail ZZ, Hummadi KK. Immobilization of mixed bacteria by novel biocarriers extracted from Cress and Chia seeds for biotreatment of anionic surfactant (SDS)-bearing real wastewaters. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2022;
Basu S, Dasgupta M, Chakraborty B. Removal of Chromium (VI) by Bacillus subtilis Isolated from East Calcutta Wetlands, West Bengal, India. 2014;
Vijayalakshmi V, Senthilkumar P, Mophin-Kani K, Sivamani S, Sivarajasekar N, Vasantharaj S. Bio-degradation of Bisphenol A by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAb1 isolated from effluent of thermal paper industry: Kinetic modeling and process optimization. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2018 Jan 1;11(1):56-65.
Tavassoli T, Mousavi SM, Shojaosadati SA, Salehizadeh H. Asphaltene biodegradation using microorganisms isolated from oil samples. Fuel. 2012 Mar 1;93:142-8.
Manogaran M, Habib NMSA, Shukor MY, Yasid NA. Mathematical Modeling of Substrate Inhibition Kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus Growth on Basic Violet 3. Bioremediation Sci Technol Res. 2022 Dec 31;10(2):50-5.
Halmi MIE, Abdullah SRS, Johari WLW, Ali MSM, Shaharuddin NA, Khalid A, et al. Modelling the kinetics of hexavalent molybdenum (Mo6+) reduction by the Serratia sp. strain MIE2 in batch culture. Rendiconti Lincei. 2016 Dec 1;27(4):653-63.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Environmental Microbiology and Toxicology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).