Outlier Analysis of the Modified Gompertz Model used for Modelling the Growth of Callus Cultures from Glycine wightii (Wight & Arn.) Verdc.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54987/ajpb.v3i1.268Keywords:
Glycine wightii, callus growth, modified Gompertz model, least square method, Grubbs testAbstract
The production of callus and cell culture can be an important tool to study plant regulation, biosynthesis and biochemistry. Previously, we model the growth of growth of Glycine wightii published literature to obtain vital growth constants. We discovered that the modified Gompertz model was the best model based on statistical test such as root-mean-square error (RMSE), adjusted coefficient of determination (R2), bias factor (BF), accuracy factor (AF) and corrected AICc (Akaike Information Criterion) to explain the callus growth. However, the use of statistical tests to choose the best model relies heavily on the residuals of the curve to be statistically robust. Usually, the residuals need be tested for the occurrence of outliers (at 95 or 99% of confidence). In this work, the Grubb’s test to detect the presence of outlier in the growth model was carried out. The results showed that there was no outlier present, and the modified Gompertz
model was adequate to model the callus growth.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).